Piping Technology and Products has the deepest expertise of any global provider in conducting Spring Support and Expansion Joint Audits. We are the only major global manufacturer of Expansion Joints and Engineered Pipe Supports. We are also the only major manufacturer to have started as a Pipe Stress Engineering company. This gives us both system and component level expertise that is unparalleled. In addition, we have a database built from over 1000 audits performed in 41 countries as well as real-world experience from over three million Pipe Supports and Expansion Joints currently in service. Figure 1 is a snapshot of data from our proprietary database showing the average Spring Support Failure curve across all geographies and plant types.
Figure 1: Spring Support Failure Curve
Our approach to Spring Support and Expansion Joint audits is unique. When we conduct an audit, our goal is to return the piping system to the original design parameters per the Pipe Stress model. The following are some of the goals of Pipe Stress Engineering and the placement of Spring Supports and Expansion Joints in the piping system:
- Ensure stress at interface to moving equipment is below maximum allowable loads
- Ensure proper support for the piping system in both Hot and Cold states
- Minimize turbulent flow through the piping system
- Ensure longevity of piping system components
Case Study A shows an example of a program PT&P used for a turnaround at a major refinery. To conduct a complete Spring Support and Expansion Joint audit, it is important to not just focus on the health of the piping system components, but on the health of the overall piping system. The following are some of the issues that PT&P has found that cause system-level issues:
- Spring Support Failure Impact – the failure of a Spring Support will impact other supports and cause them to lose their position as they attempt to take on additional load
- Damage to Piping or Rigid Supports Changes Elevation of Spring Supports – a variety of issues can cause the piping to undergo strain which causes deformation. This will cause a change of elevation or distance from the Pipe Support to the pipe and impact the load setting.
- Improper Travel Stop Management – if travel stops are not placed properly, the spring supports can move out of position and load can be redistributed among spring supports on the same line in a way that is not consistent with the original design
- Changes to the Line – PT&P often sees changes such as new equipment or routing having an impact on the line.
By the time a plant reaches 10+ years of age, PT&P’s experience is that most plants have encountered one or more of the issues above. For this reason, it is essential to take an approach of resetting the line to the original design specification. PT&P’s approach is to:
- Structured Multi-Point Inspection of Spring Supports and Expansion Joints – because PT&P has deep design expertise in both Spring Supports and Expansion Joints, it has a very thorough approach to inspections. Appendix A-D shows the checklists and approach used by PT&P for different products.
- Assessment of Line Conditions – when Springs or Expansion Joints are out of position, PT&P begins to assess overall conditions on the line and factors which may cause these issues other than the functioning of the component itself. System-level issues which can affect a spring or expansion joint include:
- Elevation Changes
- Broken Spring Support
- Broken or Missing Rigid Support
- New Elements on the line – potentially with different loads than original elements
- Estimation of Loads if Not Available – a common issue for many customers is the loss of information around a Spring Support on load and movement. PT&P has 3 ways of recreating this information:
- Estimate the Load (Cheapest, Least Accurate) – PT&P can use information about the line and a view of the original Spring Support to estimate the load and movement.
- Weigh the Line – PT&P can weigh the line to estimate the load
- Recreate Pipe Stress Analysis (Most Accurate) – PT&P can recreate the Pipe Stress analysis to get the most accurate view of load and movements.
- Detailed Report and Recommended Plan of Action – PT&P will provide a very detailed report and recommended plan of action.
The challenge with this approach to preventative maintenance is that it takes a much deeper level of expertise than a component level inspection. PT&P’s experience is that even the ability to operate a Pipe Stress Modeling Software Program such as Caesar is far different than a pragmatic understanding of the proper functioning of all the elements of the piping line. Many personnel and firms supporting Piping System maintenance are challenged with managing a broad range of equipment at an operating plant and this can make it difficult to have the depth in Pipe Stress that may be required to properly execute a System Level Audit and develop a plan to return the piping system to the original design specification.
In addition to helping our customers conduct audits, we can assist with the development of an overall preventative maintenance strategy for Spring Supports and Expansion Joints. Almost every plant we visit is challenged by budgetary issues that limit the overall budget for preventative maintenance. PT&P believes the best approach is to prioritize. Figure 2 shows an example of a prioritization scheme. We have often assisted our customers in developing an overall prioritization approach. Prioritization is taken into account in any recommendations we make after a Pipe Stress Audit.
Figure 2: Spring Support and Expansion Joint Prioritization
Case Study A: Turnaround plan and Execution for a Major Refinery
A. Pipe Supports
- 10 Units
- >600 Spring Supports
- 12% Adjusted
- 14% Replaced
B. Expansion Joint Installation Supervision
- 36 Expansion Joints Replaced
PT&P provided 2 Engineers for:
- Pipe Supports Inspection on cold condition
- Supervision of adjustment of the spring supports
- Installation of Spring Supports as per in Table A for the period of 30 days.
In addition to the above, PT&P provided a supervisor (Expansion Joint Technical Expert) to supervise the installation of expansion joints.
PT&P provided 2 engineers about a year before the turnaround to perform the hot inspection of the spring supports while cold inspection was done by PT&P in previous the turnaround. All these inspected supports were documented in a report and categorized the supports condition under Good, Replacement and Adjustment required.
Based on the location provided on the inspection report, and constant communication between PT&P engineers and turnaround co-coordinators, the location where the scaffold are to be built are pre-planned.
The materials were purchased a few months before the turnaround. All the required safety trainings, drug tests, background checks were done before the turnaround date.
Out of 10 units, 4 units were down in the beginning. PT&P Engineers performed a quick walk down on all the spring supports of the units to see if there are any new issues since the last inspection which required immediate attention. This gave enough time to order the materials and necessary hardware.
After the quick inspection, PT&P was provided with a few technicians for 2 different units, and adjustment and installation work at 2 units were done concurrently.
Once those units were done, PT&P engineers were mobilized to other units. There were a few new discoveries where PT&P engineers ordered materials for adjustment and replacement. Within a couple of days, PT&P managed to supply the parts (shipped through hot shot) and resolve the issues.
There were 5 times, PT&P provided the materials during the period of turnaround within 48 hours. It was very convenient to have engineers supervising the installation and repair as it allowed for design and/or engineering changes to be made on the spot.
In addition to the pre-planned turnaround work, PT&P engineers were requested several occasions to help resolve issues such as bent struts, check the condition of counterweight (old style), some new expansion work which included the addition of new pipe supports.
Some pictures of replaced cans:
|Before and after the replacement of cracked spring support|
|Bend rod during T/A work||After Repair||During follow up Hot Inspection|
The rod was bent during the turnaround since the contractor working with the line didn’t put the travel stop while working with the line. The support should have been locked and disengage from the system for this specific work on the pipe coming off the reactor as the line seems to have higher movement during T/A work. This was the second time the rod was bent. PT&P engineers who were on-site for other spring supports work were contacted immediately. Less than an hour, PT&P reps went to assess the condition and come up with a better and robust design. The materials were purchased as per PT&P engineers’ recommendation. Since the order came directly from the field with PT&P employee, the approval and manufacturing process was smooth and quick. Within a couple of days, the materials arrived and were successfully installed. Everything looks great during the follow up hot inspection.
For Expansion Joints:
PT&P supervisor was on site the entire time helping the contractor remove and put in the new expansion joints. Almost all of the contractor workers were inexperienced or very limited experience working with expansion joints.
PT&P supervisor gave a quick training about removing and installing the new Expansion Joints. They also pointed out the importance of being sensitive towards the Expansion Joint fabric since one small improper cut could damage the belt.
PT&P supervisor assisted the contractor with the proper marking of the backing bar while removing the old Expansion Joint. He inspected the condition of the joint and guided contractors to efficiently put the new expansion joint. He also showed the proper way to splice the fabric materials to complete the Expansion Joint installation.
Case Study B: Spring supports issues on Manifolds of a heater
PT&P performed a cold inspection on all the spring supports from manifolds. The cold inspection showed that most of the supports were good as they were in the cold position. However, after performing a second inspection, it was concluded that most of the spring supports didn’t show any sign of movement.
One inspection qualified these supports were good, but later second inspection concluded that these spring supports weren’t functioning properly. This issue was brought up with customer contacts and later found out that the customer was indeed having some issues with tubing affecting the efficiency.
|During Cold Inspection||During Hot Inspection|
Since this issue needed to be addressed to prevent any failure in the future, all the supports from the manifold were assessed properly and concluded that there is a need for system-level repair. Therefore, on the 2019 turnaround , all the spring supports of the manifold were replaced.
The following pictures show that the new supports are moving as designed and system wise-repair was indeed required.
|During Hot Inspection (May 2019)||During Cold Inspection (March 2019)|
5 Spring Supports from a manifold were replaced during 2019 T/A
All together 35 spring supports on manifolds were replaced due to failure of previous spring supports.
Appendix A: PT&P Checklist for Spring Support Appendix B: PT&P Expansion Joint InspectionsAppendix C: Slide Plates InspectionsAppendix D: Snubber Inspections